Case study
The expertise is theirs. The platform was ours.
QFS Assurance provides consulting, training, verification and inspection to organizations in the food supply chain. The expertise is theirs and stays theirs. Everything it runs on — the learning system, the registration platform, the website, the mail that has to arrive — was ours to operate.
We took both systems over mid-flight, which is the hardest way to inherit anything. Much of the first year was operations: courses created, duplicated and retired, enrolments imported, exams scheduled, reopened and re-permissioned, certificates issued. Email deliverability ran as a thread from the first month to nearly the last.
Then building. A new B2B website, from questionnaire and sitemap through wireframes and data model to implementation and launch. An assessment instrument, several rounds deep. A kiosk. An evaluation of a different learning platform — installed, audited, hosted, with the interactive-content and registration integrations ported across.
A catalogue is not a learning platform. Publishing content, registering a learner, taking payment, recording attendance, completing a course and issuing a certificate are six different things one word hides, and knowing which of them already works — and who owns it — is most of the job.
What this record establishes
A dated record of the work itself, August 2024 to May 2026.
What it does not: Detailed implementation and results were not inspected, and no certification or food-safety outcomes are claimed as caused by this work.
If this resembles your situation, the next step is a conversation about your specifics.
Discuss a similar projectEach case study describes a real engagement or venture, and states what its record establishes and what it does not. Clients and partners keep ownership of their own expertise, delivery and results.