Case study

Running the offer, not recommending one

Iván founded Genesis Legal and ran it as CEO across two separately listed periods, 2015–2016 and 2020–2022. The idea was to simplify how company incorporation gets done — a service-design problem before a technology one.

Founder responsibility is not advisory responsibility. It covers the offer and the operation behind it, not just a recommendation handed to someone else. And the two periods stay separate here: nothing on the record explains the gap, and inventing an explanation would be the easiest mistake available.

What this record establishes

A description of the founder role and the service offer, carried from earlier records.

What it does not: Proprietary software delivery, legal qualifications, incorporation volume and present service availability are not established.

Venture
Genesis Legal
Relationship
Founder-led venture
Role
Founder and Chief Executive Officer
Period
Two periods: 2015–2016 and 2020–2022
Industry
Professional Services
Services
Technology Strategy, Digital Product Development

This is part of the background we bring to client work. If you want that judgement applied to your own situation, start here.

Talk about your project

Each case study describes a real engagement or venture, and states what its record establishes and what it does not. Clients and partners keep ownership of their own expertise, delivery and results.

All case studies

Discuss your project